Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
When Coldstone is released, we will see a slew of people complaining because Coldstone doesn't include X or doesn't have their pet feature Y. There will be people posting lists of features they'd like to see added to the game.
That isn't the prediction (that's a given -- it is too easy of a prediction) -- my prediction is that the people who complain about Coldstone lacking this or that, or who post extensive wishlists -- they will not be the ones who create anything with Coldstone.
The people who download Coldstone, immerse themselves in it, and quietly start unleashing their imagination within the framework that Coldstone provides will be the ones who stretch Coldstone to its limits and create wonderful things with it.
------------------ Andrew Welch / el Presidente / Ambrosia Software, Inc. Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level then beat you with experience.
Well said, I guess the old adage goes, "neccessity is the mother of invention"...
Here's looking to the future, and hoping Ambrosia and Beenox don't stop with version 1.0, don't stop after they've tailored Coldstone as the perfect editor for their flagship PoG, and PoG into a masterpiece, who will hear the cries of those recognize excellence when they see it, but always strive for more. Coldstone deserves a fighting chance. The fans and designers deserve a fighting chance. Ambrosia/Beenox deserves a fighting chance.
Saphfire
------------------
I have an even more accurate prediction:
The people who do not have Coldstone are the ones who will not be making anything with it. Can't go wrong!
But seriously, that's one of the things that concerns me. A friend and I are making plans for a Coldstone RPG-- he's on a G4, I'm on a PC. Dunno if there will be a Windows version yet, but perhaps I can make graphics anyway, and he can import them into Coldstone.
In a lot of cases the feature request posts aren't so much demanding feature X or feature Y as determining the limits of their ability to create games with Coldstone. See my post entitled "Battle System Creation": now that we know more about the battle system and how we may be able to customize it, we can start planning the battle system, but you never know until you ask.
-Nij
Quote
Originally posted by Nijhazer: ** I have an even more accurate prediction:
-Nij**
Both PoG and Coldstone will be available for Windows.
------------------ Nicholas Shanks Author of HexEdit and ResKnife: Available at (url="http://"http://nickshanks.com/mac/")nickshanks.com(/url)
So, what is the battle system gonna be? Real time or turn based? Just strait out no games, just tell us what it is as of now, don't tell us it could change cuz we already know that.
------------------ Pokemon is awsome! Anyone why says otherwise is too old. Go to the unofficial EV webboard site! Just click (url="http://"http://yoshi.zzux.com/phpbb/")here(/url) to go. Go to my ezboard, (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/bmousesboards")Mouse's Boards(/url)!
a) It's already been stated that Coldstone has one combat engine. PoG is made with Coldstone c) according to macnn's preview, "Pillars of Garendall is combat-intensive and features a Diablo II-style point-and-click battle engine,"
No, it's not a straightforward answer, but you could have figured this out yourself.
------------------ People who claim the sky is falling obviously aren't aware the earth is falling, too.
(This message has been edited by sanehatter (edited 05-15-2001).)
The battle system will most definitely be real-time. I believe (and hope), judging by the movies and the update logs, that not all battles have to incorporate the Diablo/Baldur's Gate style point-and-click hack-and-slash. Unless it's been changed, battles can be completely controlled with creator/user defined hotkeys.
Well, I am still hoping for a chance at turn-based, but if I have to use a realtime battle system, I guess I can deal with it. It just won't be the way I feel my game will need to be without TB battle.
Originally posted by Mouse Well, I am still hoping for a chance at turn-based
(sigh)...give it up, it aint coming. :rolleyes:
------------------ Ladies and Gentlemen, as you know we have something special for you at Birdland this evening. A recording for Blue Note Records... Let's take it back to the concrete streets, original beats and real live MC's... "We find it hard to strike a good balance between reality and fun. The reason being? Reality is often not fun." - _pipeline
On the "eternal optimist" side, I seriously think that, with enough time and effort, you could simulate a pretty decent turn-based combat system by using a lot of event scripting and custom variables. It wouldn't be nearly as straightforward as just making hostile NPCs and plopping them on a map to use the actual Coldstone combat engine, but I think it would definitely be possible. Whether it would be feasible is, of course, another matter altogether.
------------------ Back in my day, we didn't have any of this here UBB nonsense. It was DiscBoard or nothing, and we liked it! "In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane." - Mark Twain "The answer is yes or no , depending on the interpretation." - Albert Einstein
Originally posted by sanehatter: c) according to macnn's preview, "Pillars of Garendall is combat-intensive and features a Diablo II-style point-and-click battle engine,"
Grr. I dislike that syle.
------------------ "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his. " - General George Patton (url="http://"http://dhm.smoovenet.com")Don't Hate Me(/url) | (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/bstarbasedelta")Starbase Delta Forums(/url) | (url="http://"http://yoshi.zzux.com/phpBB/index.php")Unofficial Boards(/url) | (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/btitansboard65830")Titan's Boards(/url) | (url="http://"http://www.secretchimp.f2s.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard//ikonboard.cgi")Funhouse!(/url)
Originally posted by Starkiller: **Grr. I dislike that syle.
**
Don't we all...or maybe that was just me.
As I said though, it's not a given for all Coldstone games.
I won't stop hoping for TB battle until I'm old and sweet(young and bitter now).
------------------ Pokemon is awsome! Anyone why says otherwise is too old. Go to the unofficial EV webboard site! Just click (url="http://"http://yoshi.zzux.com/phpbb/")here(/url) to go. That's where the Arorian Outlook is. Go to my ezboard, (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/bmousesboards")Mouse's Boards(/url)!
Originally posted by andrew: **When Coldstone is released, we will see a slew of people complaining because Coldstone doesn't include X or doesn't have their pet feature Y. There will be people posting lists of features they'd like to see added to the game.
::thaws , "quietly starts unleashing" his bladder::
....Ooohaaahooaahahhhhh, spells relief Es mas extraÅ„a por el Presidente a escribÃo algo como eso.
::reconstitutes:: Hap cha Ha , It appears that the labor draws to a close , could this be a ploy to cut down the hype that has grown around the Mythic creature ,CGE . Interesante ...So you're cushioning the blow of the primary release of CGE ::in eerie echo:: v1.0 . Ooo , Andrew doesn't want our feelings to get hurt .
:: pedazos de helado se duchan la cuarta , me desapareco ::
------------------ remember if you gonna be a monkey be a M**F'n Gorilla
(This message has been edited by chill_rx (edited 05-17-2001).)
Just allow the use of shared libraries and tell everyone if they want x or y, make it themselves in c++.
umm... realtime combat does not necessarily mean diablo...
what about zelda (snes)? can anyone really complain about the gameplay in that game?
------------------ jwalton (url="http://"http://www.four09.org")409(/url) (url="http://"http://www.four09.org/jp")mmodule(/url)
Originally posted by jwalton: **umm... realtime combat does not necessarily mean diablo...
One person battles.
BTW, I do love Zelda. I just don't consider it an RPG, more like an adventure game. I like Diablo, but I don't consider that an RPG either, it would fall under, by my definition, action or hack and slash. But, let's not bring up an arguement.
Hack&slash; is a separate ganre then action? I never knew that. Excuse me, I have to wipe a bug off my screen... (whap) (scrape)
------------------ Pokemon is awsome! Anyone why says otherwise is too old to get it. Go to the unofficial EV webboard site! Just click (url="http://"http://yoshi.zzux.com/phpbb/")here(/url) to go. That's where the Arorian Outlook is. Go to my ezboard, (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/bmousesboards")Mouse's Boards(/url)!
If this game is going to be like diablo does that mean support for random items? (and to what level of complexity)
Originally posted by anark: **If this game is going to be like diablo does that mean support for random items? (and to what level of complexity)
-29° ::grabs the mic::
ahem ::Prepares to answer your question in it's entirety::
Yes... It has complete support there is sucha thing as random events you can set them up to have enemies items , (treasure chests with enemies) and if you're really ingenious have warps and buildings appear ::eyes glimmer, frozen smile cracks:: Yes...you heard me,There is a Way ...
::drops the now brittle mic ,shatters, dissaptes:: =29°
------------------ I'm that man that squats out of jeeps and vans, jump from rof to roof on the TV cam....