Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
@mrxak, on Nov 10 2007, 06:17 AM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
Hey... wait a second guys. Who were the four people that voted for prophile? I just counted and recounted, and I only get three for prophile, four for Manta, and one abstain:
Anon - abstain Dark Jet - prophile darth_vader - Eugene Chin - prophile 1Eevee1 - Manta GutlessWonder - prophile Manta - mrxak - Manta nfreader - prophile - RJC Ultra - Manta Selax - SoItBegins - Manta
Did somebody go back and edit their posts? Did Mackilroy miscount? What happened?
You forgot my selfdefense vote for prophile, I never removed it because I was in continuous danger of death.
I will likely place my vote later today for this round, I need more time to sort out exactly who is guilty after that deluge of information last round.
@manta, on Nov 10 2007, 09:18 AM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
But neither him nor you voted in the tie breaker. They would have canceled out anyway if they were assumed to be made. I counted only votes made after Mackilroy declared a tiebreaker mini-round.
I'm sorry, I vote Manta ( retracted ).
EDIT: It appears that in my absence, my role as a special - the mercenary/assassin - has been revealed. Well, that's me screwed over, so I might as well say this in public:
GutlessWonder , you're going down.
This post has been edited by prophile : 10 November 2007 - 06:46 PM
<insert maniacal laughter here>
However this game turns out, I think it'll have been the most fun of all the games I played. Intrigue, backstabbing, votes not going anywhere. We're like a model UN. /me sheds a tear of joy
But yeah, despite mrxak's pleas to kill off Eugene Chin (and despite Eugene Chin's previous votes against myself), I can't see that voting him dead could actually be a good strategy, since it could kill two innocents.
There are the possibilities that it could kill one terrorist, or even two, but orchestrating all of this between two terrorists who, if we're to believe mackilroy, probably don't know each other, would be a massive show of skill. At this point I think I'll exercise a little restraint and hold off on voting for anyone.
You missed Selax's vote for prophile, because he forgot to bold it.
@prophile, on Nov 10 2007, 08:27 AM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
Hmm, you posted this as I was reading the topic and making my own post. At any rate, "that's what she said"
cough
To what do I owe this allegedly singular gesture?
This post has been edited by GutlessWonder : 10 November 2007 - 11:26 AM
I have a wedding to rehearse and go to today and tomorrow. I'll try and squeeze in a vote sometime tonight if I'm not busy.
@gutlesswonder, on Nov 10 2007, 04:25 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
Hmm, you posted this as I was reading the topic and making my own post. At any rate, "that's what she said" cough To what do I owe this allegedly singular gesture?
Last request of an ally.
No offence meant.
GutlessWonder posted some stuff earlier, something along the lines of "you can't stop me" etc. Note the edited line in his last post. He's guilty.
@nfreader, on Nov 10 2007, 10:33 AM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
pix or didn't happen. ^_^
As for the edit, I changed to 'allegedly' from 'admittedly', since it flows better and gives a better meaning.
If edits made immediately after a post (and hence unlikely to be seen in normal form anyways (/casting doubt)) are being called into question, I'll just have to make more posts.
self-defense vote: nfreader
Sort of a random thought, GutlessWonder, what the heck is your avatar?
@mrxak, on Nov 10 2007, 12:48 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
Just a take on the cross of Christ. Red marks for the hands, feet, and head.
mrxak , the last time you played like this you were evil. Having watched you closely, and compared that to your playstyle from earlier games, I am quite convinced you are evil, and if you aren't, you are still damaging the innocents' prospects. We can still win this, and the sooner we eliminate mrxak, the better our chances are.
@gutlesswonder, on Nov 10 2007, 08:01 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
Maybe you're not a terrorist after all...
Or maybe he's a cunningly disguised terrorist. Or a Christian terrorist like that nutter in Contact.
Only God knows...
mrxak, its satisfactory... I've retracted my vote..
I'll wait and see what happens between now and tomorrow, as I've got a date to go to. Enjoy all!
-Dark
@prophile, on Nov 10 2007, 10:27 AM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
I'm sorry, I vote Manta.
Prophile, I still do not understand why vote for me, maybe it is a spite move to hurt me for defending myself last round when I was still getting my bearings. I will not vote for you this round, unless new evidence that convicts you appears, because of your apparent role for the side of good.
@nfreader, on Nov 10 2007, 12:33 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War:
nfreader , I believe that you are trying to incrimanate someone with something I have seen no proof of aside from the edit which is likely for spelling, I also notice that when I edit a post quickly after I post it is because of spelling like GutlessWonder claims his is for. Until you can produce proof of this, like a screenshot, I will unfortunately assume you are a terrorist trying to kill more people.
Fine, I admit it, I'm one of the dictators. I don't see any point in doing this any longer.
Well done, you caught me.
Game over, civilians win.
Congratulations.