prophile and mrxak were doing a very bad job of distancing in the last round. prophile is definitely also a mafia.

@prophile, on Jun 14 2008, 06:44 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War Game 25:

mrxak, I might be quiet but I'm not stupid. I read your post yesterday and it was all mrxak, mrxak, mrxak, mrxak, mrxak. I reserved judgement. However, turning on me because I make an easy target isn't going to save you today. Thing is, I've played the werewolf game plenty of times before, and I see a wolf sitting under the radar not by idling, but by acting as if a leader. Sorry mate, you don't fool me.

These two are mafia together.

vote mrxak for now, but prophile is definitely mafia as well.

######.

These days always end too ######ing fast, even though I know exactly how long they last.

Since the images are easily extractable and you're not selling the mod, as far as I know, there'd be nothing wrong with it.

@darth_vader, on Jun 10 2008, 11:52 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War Game 25:

Why is everyone crediting mrxak with playing just like he always does? He's being noticeably more aggressive. I can't believe that the only people who see this are me and Shlimazel. This makes no sense. Pay attention people!

To be honest, if anyone is acting out of the ordinary, it's you. Your push for mrxak is becoming more and more desperate, and he really isn't anymore aggressive than usual in my eyes. darth_vader

I've been busy with work and building my computer, and the pace of these games is pretty fast... I'll try to get back into things for the next round if I can. Sorry all.

@mrxak, on Jun 4 2008, 02:11 AM, said in Global Thermonuclear War Game 25:

I'm willing to table SoItBegin's death for the time being and vote lemonyscapegoat, the guy who's either lurking or just isn't even in the game.

I second this. lemonyscapegoat

JacaByte is one to keep in mind after this nightkill, but that should not be a basis for lynching him - it could just as easily be the mafia picking someone randomly.

@soitbegins, on Jun 2 2008, 10:42 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War Game 25:

I do this in the first round as my way of clowning around a little before the real game starts (i.e. after someone gets killed.)

This is really quite bad. Our goal is always to get terrorists, no matter what day it is.

Quote

Mispeled didn't vote for me; you did.

<_<

jrsh92 said:

I will be voting mrxak next round. His over agressive yet heavily justified reasoning for votes that in reality aren't as definitely useful as he says they are, is EXACTLY how I played last round-- when I was a terrorist.

mrxak is always an aggressive drama queen. I see no reason why we should assume he'd play the same way that you do.

Quote

As far as I am concerned, if he lives through tonight, something the terrorists rarely let mrxak do, he's almost certainly a terrorist.

Yeah, and hopefully they'll completely miss your post so they won't get the idea to let him live, right? :rolleyes:

I really think that our tunnel vision on SIB and mrxak is dangerous. Mackilroy and 1Eevee1 quite blatantly jumped on the bandwagon without having said anything else this entire game.

@hypochondriac, on Jun 2 2008, 07:07 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War Game 25:

mrxak thus causing a tie because soitbegins always votes randomly and mrxak always votes for him. Either one of them or both could be terrorists and are just following set patterns. I'm distrustful of both of them and want them to have an equal chance of being lynched. Hope whoever breaks the tie choses the right one.

I see no reason at all to believe that either of them must be the right choice. This kind of absolutism feels like a terrorist trying to get the town on a leash to me. vote Hypochondriac

@soitbegins, on Jun 2 2008, 08:19 PM, said in Global Thermonuclear War Game 25:

I will only change my vote in the first round if it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY to save my own skin. And then only some of the time.

I'm not going to comment on suspicion at this point, but I really think this is just bad play. Really, thinking of any vote as permanent, especially a random one that you yourself admit is nothing more than an "opening shot", is simply naive and unhelpful. I really want to discourage everyone from voting with the mindset that the person you're voting for is the only person you'll be focussed on for the whole round.

@mrxak, on Jun 2 2008, 11:07 AM, said in Global Thermonuclear War Game 25:

The only way the innocents can win is if we get rid of people who cause distractions.

Wrong answer. We win by killing terrorists.

If killing annoying people is really all you care about, then EVHawkman is a much better choice, anyway.

The only thing I have an issue with is equating "voting randomly" with "killing randomly". No vote is set in stone until the end of the round. If SIB is willing to change his vote when he finds someone more suspicious, there's nothing anti-town about his initial random vote.