Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
Quote
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **Alright then, you're on. My next project will be a Confederation Set. **
Great! It will be much appreciated.
------------------ Prepare to succumb to superior intelligence Terrorist Strike (url="http://"http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/images/anatomy_attack_pentagon2.gif")Pentagon Attack(/url)-(url="http://"http://www.ap.org/pages/active_front/picture.jpg")AP Photo of the Day(/url) Military Technology - (url="http://"http://www.army-technology.com/")Army(/url) - (url="http://"http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/factfile/ffiletop.html")Navy(/url) - (url="http://"http://www.af.mil/news/indexpages/fs_index.shtml")Air Force(/url)
Originally posted by General Rak: **Oh yes! Also one with more aggressive and sleeker curves. **
Doesn't MAGMA do that good enough for you?
------------------ - Macavenger | e-mail: (url="http://"mailto:e-gamerguy1@home.com")mailto:e-gamerguy1@home.com(/url)e-gamerguy1@home.com
Originally posted by Macavenger: **Doesn't MAGMA do that good enough for you?:p **
Can I use MAGMA grapics for plug-ins?
Skyblade- When you finish a confederation set, do an Atinoda or Maskirovka set. There are almost no good sets for them.
Originally posted by Macavenger: **Doesn't MAGMA do that good enough for you?:p
**
The MAGMA graphics are excellent, but my Confederation set will add many more ships than just the originals.
Originally posted by Rak: **Skyblade- When you finish a confederation set, do an Atinoda or Maskirovka set. There are almost no good sets for them.
I've considered that as well. I might have to do another EVO set once I finish the Confederation one, but we'll see how that goes...
------------------ -Cap'n Skyblade (url="http://"http://www.saberstudios.f2s.com")Saber Studios(/url) - Your source for original EV/O/N graphics. the United Earth Graphics Expansion Set: Coming soon
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **I've considered that as well. I might have to do another EVO set once I finish the Confederation one, but we'll see how that goes... **
Okay... just continue the good graphics work
Originally posted by General Rak: **Okay... just continue the good graphics work:)
Thanks, appreciate it.
I'm actually rather surprised that the EVO community doesn't mind me halting work on the UE set and doing the Confederation one instead...
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: I've totally re-done the homepage and other portions of Saber Studios, so pay a visit and tell me what you think. If you have a slow connection, the site will take roughly 23.7 years to load.;)
Yeah, its messed up for me in NS, too. I looked at the source; its probably all that funky code you've got just to have some rollovers (at least I think thats what some of that was...). My advice would be to strip it of that code and see how it works in NS then (ie: make it index1.html, or something like that).
It does load slow for me, too. I think a good thing to do to help those with slow connections (I have cable) would be to provide full text-based navigational links on every page; right now, you've got "go back to index" and "contact" links, but you should have links to every other section from each section.
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: I plan on moving the website to my dad's swift server soon, however, so that should fix the slow loading speed.
Bah, I can think of a better place to move it.
------------------ EVula (url="http://"mailto:evula@evula.com")mailto:evula@evula.com(/url)evula@evula.com
Originally posted by EVula: **Yeah, its messed up for me in NS, too. I looked at the source; its probably all that funky code you've got just to have some rollovers (at least I think thats what some of that was...). My advice would be to strip it of that code and see how it works in NS then (ie: make it index1.html, or something like that).
Hmmmm... I didn't actually create those rollovers using straight java code, but did it visually using GoLive. Perhaps removing the rollovers would fix the problem with Netscape (and not only that, but decrease loading time...)?
Yes, it seems as though most of the members here with cable have had problems with loading the website swiftly. But strangely enough, several of the members over at the Override forum (SilverDragon and VoinianAmbassador are who I had in mind) said that they loaded the website between 3 to 8 seconds using 56k connections. That's much faster than I would have expected...
I'll try putting additional text links on the pages you mentioned. Thanks for the advice...
Originally posted by EVula: **Bah, I can think of a better place to move it.;)
Heh, why do you say that? I do know that my dad's server has owned a reputation for being quite fast...
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **Heh, why do you say that? I do know that my dad's server has owned a reputation for being quite fast...;) **
Bleh, EVula just wants all EV stuff hosted on his site.
Also, it doesn't surprise me that 56k people are getting it as fast as those of us with cable modems are. If f2s can only crank out data as fast as a 56k can take it, you won't get any advantage from having cable.
Originally posted by Macavenger: **Bleh, EVula just wants all EV stuff hosted on his site.;) **
Actually, EVula wants his site to be the only EV site on the web with every single idea and site being his
But then again, his (url="http://"http://www.EVula.com")site(/url) is the ultimate EV site and the best on the web!
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: Hmmmm... I didn't actually create those rollovers using straight java code, but did it visually using GoLive.
GoLive? Bleh. Use BBEdit.
Actually, I think you should strip out the rollovers for a test page; if the test page works in NS and the original doesn't, you know that you need to find a new rollover script (the one I use isn't 100% great, otherwise I'd offer it; I'm still looking for a simple and reliable one).
Originally posted by Macavenger: Bleh, EVula just wants all EV stuff hosted on his site.;)
I wouldn't say that; I'd say that I want "a consolidated source for everything EV". Sounds much better than "Everyone bow down to me as their master", does it not?
Originally posted by EVula: **GoLive? Bleh. Use BBEdit.:)
Hey, I spent a lot of money on GoLive, so don't tell me to use something else.
I'll try your advice and see what happens. Thanks for making me aware of the problem...
Originally posted by EVula: **I wouldn't say that; I'd say that I want "a consolidated source for everything EV". Sounds much better than "Everyone bow down to me as their master", does it not?
Speaking of wanting "consolidated sources," did you ever get my link submission?
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **Hey, I spent a lot of money on GoLive, so don't tell me to use something else.;) **
What? GoLive costs the most of $250 USD. But anyway, get Dreamweaver
Originally posted by General Rak: **What? GoLive costs the most of $250 USD. But anyway, get Dreamweaver:p
Just remember that the money I payed for GoLive was hard-earned. It certainly seemed like a lot to me.
I cannot stand Dreamweaver. I have a friend down the street who uses it, and the layout is sick. I've grown up with Adobe products, so I find all the layouts (from Photoshop to GoLive) to be extrememly user-friendly.
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **Just remember that the money I payed for GoLive was hard-earned. It certainly seemed like a lot to me.;)
I cannot (bold)stand(/bold) Dreamweaver. I have a friend down the street who uses it, and the layout is sick. I've grown up with Adobe products, so I find all the layouts (from Photoshop to GoLive) to be extrememly user-friendly. **
So then what is Cinema 4D, a** bustingly earned
Why not? I use almost all adobe products, but I find dreamweaver clearly superior to GoLive. Just my opinion, though!
Originally posted by General Rak: So then what is Cinema 4D, a bustingly earned:p
If I do get Cinema 4D, it will be in a few years.
As for Dreamweaver being better than GoLive, that is definately your opinion. All the major web designers I know say they find GoLive the more powerful program...
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: Hey, I spent a lot of money on GoLive, so don't tell me to use something else.
That sounds like your fault, not mine.
But seriously, though, if you're going to use WYSIWYG, you really should have a source-only editor to clean up everything. BBEdit excells at that, and you can get BBEdit Lite for free. (funny thing is, Lite is at 4.6, and my full version is 4.5; It is an awesome program, and I've yet to see a reason to upgrade).
I do agree with your comment on Dreamweaver; I had to use it for a job one time, and it ended up being so ass-backwards that I went RUNNING to BBEdit (the client had said that the tables would be too complicated for me in BBEdit; I could have fixed the problem easier if the original template (it wasn't mine) hadn't been done in WYSIWYG).
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: Speaking of wanting "consolidated sources," did you ever get my link submission?
Yup, got both of them; possibly all three of them, I got a blank one, too. Only hit the button once.
Originally posted by EVula: **That sounds like your fault, not mine.
I do agree with your comment on Dreamweaver; I had to use it for a job one time, and it ended up being so ass-backwards that I went RUNNING to BBEdit (the client had said that the tables would be too complicated for me in BBEdit; I could have fixed the problem easier if the original template (it wasn't mine) hadn't been done in WYSIWYG). **
Yeap, buying GoLive is certainly my fault, and I meant for it to be.
I'll have to check out BBEdit sometime. Sounds pretty good. The only other web application I really like and find easy to use is Visual Page (excellent program, and also free).
Glad to see someone else agrees about Dreamweaver's problems. I went to GoLive immediately after I first set eyes on it.
Originally posted by EVula: **Yup, got both of them; possibly all three of them, I got a blank one, too. Only hit the button once. **
That's weird, I only hit the "submit" button once (but it took forever for the webpage to except it). Perhaps it's because your page was made in BBEdit?
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: I'll have to check out BBEdit sometime.
Definetly. You have tons more power over your website in BBEdit than you do in WYSIWYG, as you can edit anything. It also has tons of tools for you to use in conjunction with your coding, as well as syntax coloring (makes looking at source easier, as you can tell what is a link, what is code, what is an image, and what is plain text). It also has a cool Entities palette, allowing you to not have to remember every mutli-lingual character (ï or é or ò, even though I did do those from memory), as well as other misc characters. Plus, its über-powerful Find & Replace feature has made the numerous minor redesigns of the Lair a LOT easier on me, and in the end, isn't that what its all about?
You can get BBEdit from here. (info on Lite) Like they say: "It doesn't suck. " So true.
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **That's weird, I only hit the "submit" button once (but it took forever for the webpage to except it). Perhaps it's because your page was made in BBEdit?:p **
More like because my server is worth less than, well, I won't say what. Suffice to say that it is worthless. When I move the (url="http://"http://www.evula.com/")Lair(/url) to the same host that (url="http://"http://www.evula.net/")evula.net(/url) is on, then it probably won't have that problem; add to that the fact that I'll be able to add SSI to all my pages without having to rename the ".shtml"; that will be a good day, indeed.
Sorry I got off onto a rant about how I'm going to be fixing (url="http://"http://www.evula.com/")my site.(/url) Its just so natural for me.
..and if all else fails, simpletext can kick some serious butt if you know html code..
------------------