Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
Alright, this is another poll / survey to go along with the "Proton vs. Laser Turret" post. Here's a few facts:
Mass Driver Reload: 25 Mass Damage: 15 Emergy Damage: 30 Speed: 350 Inaccuracy: 1 Cost: 30,000 credits Mass: 40 tons
= = = = = = = = = =
Neutron Blaster Reload: 30 Mass Damage: 10 Emergy Damage: 30 Speed: 325 Inaccuracy: 2 Cost: 30,000 credits Mass: 35 tons
While the Mass Driver appears to carry a lead in mass damage, speed, and accuracy. The Neutron Blaster weighs less, but not by a wide margin. The mass driver also reloads a tad bit faster, so I'll throw my vote for the mass driver. The Neutron Blaster is sometimes considered a Confederation weapon, so I wouldn't touch it.
Throw your vote along with a few reasons if you like!
President of the Corsair Development Team (url="http://"http://artworks.tmgmedia.net")Corsair Homepage(/url) | (url="http://"http://pub57.ezboard.com/bcorsairdevelopers")Corsair Web Board(/url) | (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/bstarbasedelta")Starbase Delta(/url)
Quote
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **Alright, this is another poll / survey to go along with the "Proton vs. Laser Turret" post. Here's a few facts:
**
Mass driver all the way. I am not sure how much better it is in my opinion, but it seems to kill anything faster.
Between Mass Drivers and Neutron Blasters, I'd have to go with Proton Turrets.
Also, Skyblade, get your numbers straight. You screwed up the Drivers damage ratings. It should be:
Mass Damage: 30 Energy Damage:0
------------------ So go on the internet game sites and bash all the PC users!
mass driver, since it has a cooler sound file.
------------------ President of Antihero Destruction Co. and Puke & Vomit Resources HOLY %$#$, I'VE BEEN CENSORED!!
Originally posted by Macavenger: **Between Mass Drivers and Neutron Blasters, I'd have to go with Proton Turrets.:p
Sorry, but the numbers I posted were straight out of ResEdit.
Current Stats:
Neutron Blaster: 0 votes Mass Driver: 3 votes
Originally posted by Captain Skyblade: **Sorry, but the numbers I posted were straight out of ResEdit.:) **
You better double check, mine are from my old memories double-checked against ResEdit. In fact, I was looking at the resource when I posted.
Originally posted by Macavenger: **You better double check, mine are from my old memories double-checked against ResEdit. In fact, I was looking at the resource when I posted.:p
Ah-hah! I did find the problem...I have three copies of Escape Velocity, which I use for a variety of reasons. The copy I was viewing in Res Edit was the one my older brother had been messing around with. Sorry about that...
After messing the game up bad enough that I couldn't remember everything I'd done with ResEdit and having to reinstall to get a clean data file, I learned to do all my hacking in plug files. This way, you don't screw the data file up so bad that you can't undo it.
Even without the facts, I would say the railgun (mass driver). Reasons:
Cooler sound Cooler picture Cheaper (I think the neutron cannon costs 35,000) Seems to do an amazing amound of damage on any ship.
------------------ Let's see...they're diamonds on wheels. Cool.
my vote goes for Mass Driver too. It seems to have no shield damage, but in fact in can drain a ship's shields quickly, and is even better against armor. It's also cheaper, costing 30,000 when the Neutron Cannon costs 3 5 ,000.
------------------ Why settle for a $3 pound of pork meat, when you can get up to 50+ pounds of human meat free? Visit (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/bstarbasedelta")Starbase Delta(/url) today! Or come to (url="http://"http://pub69.ezboard.com/bnewsatori")New Satori(/url), my new ezboard!
Current Stats Report:
====================
Neutron Blaster: 0 votes Mass Driver: 5 votes
Wow, I've very surprised at the huge lead the Mass Driver has...
Originally posted by ESPilot: my vote goes for Mass Driver too. It seems to have no shield damage, but in fact in can drain a ship's shields quickly, and is even better against armor.
that is because none of you sillies seem to remember the damage formula hee hee
damage to shields = ( ShieldDam + ( ArmorDam / 4 ) ) damage to armor = ( ArmorDam + ( ShieldDam / 4 ) )
So, the mass driver does 7.5 to shields, 30 to armor. The neutron blaster does 32.5 to shields, 17.5 to armor.
Adjusted for reload, the damages are thus:
Per time unit, Neutron blaster: 32.5 vs Shield, 17.5 vs Armor Per time unit, Mass driver: 9 vs Shield, 36 vs Armor (Per time unit, the laser cannon deals 10.5 vs Shield, 4.5 vs Armor)
The Neutron blaster packs more of a punch overall, and, more importantly, hits where it counts: shields. however, both weapons encounter serious problems when it comes to speed and range.
the Mass driver is just over 7% faster than the Neutron blaster, but, more importantly, it persists for a longer time. the total range of the mass driver is about 75% greater than the range of the neutron blaster. (the laser cannon has a range 160% greater than the neutron blaster's). the slow speed of these weapons makes them impractical against small ships, while their short range makes them difficult to use against the larger ships as well, because the large ships are so heavily armed for close range combat. hee hee
of course, the biggest problem with these weapons is that they require an obscene quantity of weapon space. if, in theory, you were able to pack eight 5-ton laser cannons into the 40-ton space required by a mass driver, you'd have an 84 vs Shield, 36 vs Armor (adjusted for reload) weapon. this hypothetical conglomerated laser weapon is clearly far superior to either the mass driver or the neutron blaster. hee hee
if i had to pick one of these weapons, i would choose the mass driver. its range and speed make it slightly more tolerable. however, you would be far better off putting something else in the weapon space.. like missiles! i love missiles. hee hee
------------------ -Asmodaethur
Originally posted by Asmodaethur: **of course, the biggest problem with these weapons is that they require an obscene quantity of weapon space. if, in theory, you were able to pack eight 5-ton laser cannons into the 40-ton space required by a mass driver, you'd have an 84 vs Shield, 36 vs Armor (adjusted for reload) weapon. this hypothetical conglomerated laser weapon is clearly far superior to either the mass driver or the neutron blaster. hee hee;) **
Right, and that's why I bought these weapons only once in my lifetime. They have both a very serious disadvantage:
They are a waste of money and weapon-space!
For me, they are both completely useless, so I cannot give any points.
- Marko
Originally posted by Marko: **Right, and that's why I bought these weapons only once in my lifetime. They have both a very serious disadvantage:
- Marko**
That's why I voted for Proton Turrets here.
Originally posted by Marko: For me, they are both completely useless, so I cannot give any points.
yup! hee hee
The Mass Driver only because I am a Rebel(And I think it looks cool).
------------------ "The heathens are upon us. Arm yourselves and go with God." Paul Benden, Commander of the Purple Sector Fleet, prior to the Battle of Cygni. (url="http://"http://pub70.ezboard.com/bevtechsoftware")EVTech Software Webboard(/url)
Neutron, because it's more available.
------------------ I don't care what the moderators say, my nickname is swedish chef.
Neutron Blaster: 1 vote Mass Driver: 6 votes
I really never use either of them, as they both have too short a range to be useful.
------------------ YakKa Foob MoG. GRuG PubbuWuP ZiNk WattooM GaZoRK. CHuMBLE SpuZz. (url="http://"http://pub101.ezboard.com/bstarbasedelta")Starbase Delta(/url)|(url="http://"http://www.coolboard.com/myboards.cfm?oid=88975708993460")Spacestation Pheta Unofficial Forums(/url)