Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
I can't believe this Anti-American thing's been going on for 3 pages now!!! I'm so happy to see that there are people on the Internet who hate the US as much as I and most other Canadians do!!! (Oh yes, up here, "Yank" is a terrible insult.)
About the wars thing:
The only two wars the US lost, Vietnam and the War of 1812, were the two Canada didn't help them with!!!
Please don't argue that statement - it's a joke and I don't want to start a debate on it. But, America, WATCH YOUR BACK.
------------------ #29 on the Periodic Table
We uh... lost the War of 1812 eh? Funny... I thought it was different...
------------------ tear it down
Quote
But, America, WATCH YOUR BACK.
Hah! It was one of your goverment officials that once said "People's eyes glaze over when we say Canada..." Seriously, Canada is quite funny, when I even remember that it exists. Say, maybe we should invade Canada...
------------------ We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill...
Obormot wrote: **Hah! It was one of your goverment officials that once said "People's eyes glaze over when we say Canada..." Seriously, Canada is quite funny, when I even remember that it exists. Say, maybe we should invade Canada... **
Yup, take back the land that's rightfully ours
I think they are just jealous that we wouldn't let them join us in the revolution.... hehe
The US would likly loose to Canada, as they wouldn't nuke themselfs, which is what it would amount to.
~S~
------------------ PBS mind in a CNN world
Here I am way up here in a very northern part of Canada, reading through over 3 pages of inane comments about the U.S. So, I'd just like this opportunity to a) snicker derisively and b)thank God for Canada.
in 1812, canada along side its native's kicked some serious american ass, dont try it again or we'll just kill you some more
------------------
Whurp, I think you need to get a history book.... apparently you didn't know who was fighting....
Where were you guys in WWII? Of yea... you guys sent in a couple of tanks at Normady.... pansies.... didn't do anything until the end...
Canada could easily kick america's ass as many canadians have scots blood and, if there had only been enough scots, the english would be bowibg down at the feet of everyy scotsman/woman as we are the best fighters and, therefore the canadians have probably inherited some of this ability.
( think about it, the english only won because for every one we killed there3 were about three more {and every scot who died took about six english with him, think about it.....})
This is hilarious. Let's pit the US versus every country in the world now we've already gone through Australia; now it's US vs. Canada. Why not US vs. Cuba, or US vs. Ethiopia, or US vs. Bhutan
------------------ I claim my First Amendment rights to express myself through the use of high explosives.
Forgotmepassword again wrote:
Canada could easily kick america's ass
Really....Maybe in hand to hand combat. But that's not the way modern wars work.
A couple of US Ohio Class missile submarines (which I should remind you have never been detected or tracked by a foreign nation) could just crusie into Hudson Bay and and release a barrage of missiles upon Toronto, Montreal, and Quebec. Then a small detachment of F-117s or B2s, or in a dire situation, F-18s could bomb the other cities and eliminate the Canadian Airforce. Then after the country is ravaged, the US army and Marine Corps could just walk in (with air support, of course) and kill of any remaining oposition. Of course by then the Canadian Prime minister and the queen (which is still Canada's head of state) will be signing the humiliating treaty ending the pitiful Canadian war effort. Canada does not have the tech or the airforce and navy needed to defeat the US.
------------------ "There is no prostitution in China; however, we do have some women who make love for money"
-Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson
AIM/AOL:Nador26
Yahoo Messenger:OctoberFost
ColdFusion wrote: **This is hilarious. Let's pit the US versus every country in the world now we've already gone through Australia; now it's US vs. Canada. Why not US vs. Cuba, or US vs. Ethiopia, or US vs. Bhutan **
I love how you put in Canada in with Cuba, Ethiopia and Bhutan
------------------ RIP THE SYSTEM!
i gave up on this topic--why did you stop on Australia.
Oh, never mind. We must have won.
------------------ Three years and my pizza still isn't here.
Maybe I should call.
about ww2...britan had to convince america that the allies would win before the states even thought of joining in 1944, near the end of the war. also, incase you didnt read your history books that ARENT AMERICAN you'll notice that in 1812, britain was fighting france AND fighting for canada, yet america didnt win, and neither did france. also, if america attacked canada, there would be a massive outcry and the entire world would flock to our support. but theres a 1% chance that a military invasion would occur...american govt is far too smart to actually bother using their military on canada, as i admit, we are mainly protected by the USA
Whurp wrote: **about ww2...britan had to convince america that the allies would win before the states even thought of joining in 1944, near the end of the war. also, incase you didnt read your history books that ARENT AMERICAN you'll notice that in 1812, britain was fighting france AND fighting for canada, yet america didnt win, and neither did france. also, if america attacked canada, there would be a massive outcry and the entire world would flock to our support. but theres a 1% chance that a military invasion would occur...american govt is far too smart to actually bother using their military on canada, as i admit, we are mainly protected by the USA **
Last time I checked... Britain ran away from America like a scared little girl...
He has a point about WWII. It started in '38, ended in '45. the US didn't join for a while. How kind of them to go RUSHING to help their allies, friends and other stuff.
Of course, we can assume that noone in the white house wants to kill, or in the armed forces. Nope. None of them. So they'd do everything in their power to avoid a war with Canada.
Untill some Canadian kid shoots a BB gun at a passing jet, where the Earth's gravity pulls the BB back down, into the sap's eye, blinding him (He was half blind to start). The US noticed this, because their fighter pilots have nothing better to do than watch little kids with BB guns. They report back to base "Under enemy fire. Please advice."
The US idiots dont check what KIND of fire it is, and say "Return fire." while simultaniusly ordering a massive attack.
The majority of Eroupe sends troops to stop the US from pulverising Canada, because they want to look good. Serb troops take advantage of the lack of resistance and take over their little area of souther Erou/Asia (dont recall which).
Of course, this is veiwed by the US as an unprovoked attack, perverting stupid little kid's minds because they are subjected to hours of mindless forcefeeding at the hands of the government.
'Nuff said.
Skunko7 wrote: **He has a point about WWII. It started in '38, ended in '45. the US didn't join for a while. How kind of them to go RUSHING to help their allies, friends and other stuff.
~S~ **
Exactly what would the US send? 1000 soldiers with wooden guns? At the time WWII was erupting the US was extremly unmilitaried (if that is a word)... and many troops were practicing marching and drilling with WOODEN GUNS!!!!
When you just came out of a depression... you have a hard time spending money on US military stuff. Fact: We were spending only 180 million on military BEFORE WWII.... soon after Poland was invaded it was raised to 1 billion per year. We didn't have a freakin' military to send!
What was the deal with Pearl Harbor? Oh that's right... our FLEET SUCKED in camparison to Japan's huge fleet. It's not because we liked watching England suffer... we just didn't have anything to GIVE them except for aid.
Ah, but you people are forgetting about a small country that could easily beat all your countries - including the U.S. - together or one by one. Israel. Just look at the history of the wars it has participated in. Each time it was attacked by about seven Arab countries, and fully beat them back, conquered some lands, and all this with causalties in the single digits or zero. In fact, it weren't for America's deplorable control of world politics, most of these same Arab countries would have their names off the map by now.
If Israel was seriously attacked by a country like... say... Canada, Australia, or whatnot, its leaders would within the day be dead, thanks to the MOSSAD, the world's most efficient secret service. So HA! to you all.
Soviet mikee wrote: US Ohio Class missile submarines (which I should remind you have never been detected or tracked by a foreign nation)
Says who? The U.S.? Of course it does. If some country detected it, would they go screaming about it? No. So you don't know they haven't.
Obormot wrote: **Ah, but you people are forgetting about a small country that could easily beat all your countries - including the U.S. - together or one by one. Israel. Just look at the history of the wars it has participated in. Each time it was attacked by about seven Arab countries, and fully beat them back, conquered some lands, and all this with causalties in the single digits or zero. In fact, it weren't for America's deplorable control of world politics, most of these same Arab countries would have their names off the map by now.
Says who? The U.S.? Of course it does. If some country detected it, would they go screaming about it? No. So you don't know they haven't. **
Umm... yea israel was doing really great against Saddam. All the people there wore gas masks while missles reigned down. Sounds like a great plan to me
Sorry, but israel was begging the US to save them from Iraq. Israel has a powerful army... but it would be alot bigger if it was tougher...
(This message has been edited by Soviet mikee (edited 04-04-2000).)
Obormot wrote:
**
The Former Warsaw Pact Countries say so. Who do you think would trying to track them durring the 80's when they went into service? Russia embarisingly admitted that after the USSR broke up. Who else would be tracking them now? Iraq? They can't even use SCUDs properly. China? Uzbekistan would be ashamed to have Chinese technology. Isreal? Oh yeah, that makes sense. Track secret operations of your main allies, that aught to keep you freindly with them.
Even if Canada could track them, it would be sorta pointless. If they are hitting you with hundreds of cruise missiles your first priority is intercepting the missiles, not tracking a missle sub that could be anywere within 25000 miles. What good are anti-submarine aircraft when their hangar got blown up and they are in pieces? An Ohio or two could devestate Canada with hundreds of converted nucelar missiles (with the nuke warhead relaced with a high-explosive warhead) from as far away as the Red Sea or The indian ocean? As for Isreal, I don't think so. They might stand a chance with Canada or Great Britan alone, but there's a little thing called NATO that could kick their asses. A secret service might be useful, but only the country the represent still exists...