Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
i know this has been way overdone, but i figured i'd add my voice. i know ev3 is far beyond any new features at this point, but these are just things i'd like to see sometime:
just some thoughts i hope someone in a relatively high place might see eventually, preferably before ev17429 is released
------------------ if tin whistles are made of tin, what's a fog horn made of?
I WANT MISSION BIT BASED DISCRIPTIONS!!!!!!!!!
I WANT THEM NOW!!!!!!!!!
OR IN THE NEAR OR NOT-TOO-DISTANT FUTURE!!!!!!
PLEASE!!!!!!!!!
DON'T WE DESERVE THEM???????
------------------ It's funny how people running for president spend $60 Million for a $175,000 a year job. AIM-OctoberFost Yahoo Messenger-OctoberFost (url="http://"http://www.geocities.com/octoberfost")http://www.geocities.com/octoberfost(/url)
Quote
Originally posted by OctoberFost: **I WANT MISSION BIT BASED DISCRIPTIONS!!!!!!!!!
**
WTF does that mean?
------------------ Joe Burnette
"I find that humans can be divided into only two meaningful categories: Decent Humans and Sonsofbitches; both types appear to be evenly distributed among all shapes, colors, sizes, and nationalities." -- Keith Laumer
He means that he wants to be able to change the descriptions based on the mission bit that is set/cleared/or whatever.
------------------ "Holy F***! Hes got my ass!! - A friend of mine.
My website. My Bulletin Board. My Email - SmashMaster18@hotmail.com
My AIM Screen Name is JolJvik
(This message has been edited by Jol'Jvik (edited 08-13-2000).)
just thought i'd add one more idea: point defense. either the ability to target seeking weapons or automatic point defense turrets (or missiles) which shoot at the closest seeker. another thing along these lines, though somewhat more difficult to implement, would be seekers which take damage. if i fired a weapon at 60 rounds per second in the general area of an incoming seeker for the entirety of its flight time, i'd probably hit it at least once or twice. yes, it's stupid to believe a giant artillery type cannon could ever hit a missile, but a machine gun or something along those lines could basically make a cloud of bullets which could at least damage just about anything flying through it